NWEGBO v. COLWYN BOROUGH et al

Filing 36

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFT CRADDOCK'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMEN (DOC. #21) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFTS REED AND PRAY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #23) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENID IN PART. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE JACOB P. HART ON 7/3/2013. 7/3/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SUNDAY NWEGBO

:
:
:
:
:

v.
COLWYN BOROUGH, et al.

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 12-CV-05063

ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of July, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant Craddock’s Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment (Docket # 21) and Defendants Reed and Pray’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (Docket #23), as well as the Plaintiff’s responses to those motions (Docket #s 24 and 25), it is
hereby ordered that Defendant Craddock’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket #21) is
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and Defendant Reed and Pray’s Motion (Docket #23) is
GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: Counts I, V, and XI of Plaintiff’s Complaint
are dismissed; Count VI is dismissed as to Defendants Craddock and Pray; and Count X is dismissed as
to Defendant Craddock..3

BY THE COURT:

/s/Jacob P. Hart
_______________________________
JACOB P. HART
3 The remaining claims are Count III- Fourth Amendment excessive force (Reed and Craddock), Count IV- Fourth
Amendment false arrest (Reed and Craddock), Count VI- First Amendment retaliation (Reed); Count VII- state law
assault and battery (Reed and Craddock); VIII- state law false arrest (Reed and Craddock), Count IX- state law false
imprisonment (Reed and Craddock), Count X- state law malicious prosecution-(Reed). No claims remain against
Defendant Pray. By Order (docket #22), Plaintiff dismissed Colwyn Borough (Count II), and false arrest, false
imprisonment and conspiracy against Defendant Pray

24