ROSA v. ASTRUE
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 8) IS DENIED, BUT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND (ECF NO. 8) IS GRANTED FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM PURSUANT TO THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C.405(G). THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THE CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 6/28/2013. 6/28/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jmg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
JUN 2 8 2013
MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR REMAND
And NOW, this_ day of June, 2013, for the reasons discussed in the accompanying
memorandum, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.8) is
DENIED, but Plaintiffs Motion for Remand (ECF No . 8) is GRANTED for proceedings
consistent with the Court's memorandum pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
0 :\CIVIL 12\12-5102 rosa v. astrue\order_remand.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?