ROSA v. ASTRUE

Filing 16

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 8) IS DENIED, BUT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND (ECF NO. 8) IS GRANTED FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM PURSUANT TO THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C.405(G). THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THE CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 6/28/2013. 6/28/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jmg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION

WILLIAM ROSA,
Plaintiff,

FILED

V.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Defendant

JUN 2 8 2013

NO. 12-5102

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk
By
Dep. Clerk

ORDERRE:
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR REMAND
And NOW, this_ day of June, 2013, for the reasons discussed in the accompanying
memorandum, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.8) is
DENIED, but Plaintiffs Motion for Remand (ECF No . 8) is GRANTED for proceedings
consistent with the Court's memorandum pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

0 :\CIVIL 12\12-5102 rosa v. astrue\order_remand.docx

/