HEPNER v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INC.

Filing 16

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 10) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 5/24/2013. 5/29/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM HEPNER CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, Defendant. NO. 12-5443 ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Document No. 10, filed January 15, 2013), Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 11, filed January 23, 2013), and Defendant’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Document No. 14, filed February 1, 2013), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated May 24, 2013, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. That part of defendant’s Motion which seeks a dismissal of plaintiff’s claims of interference under the FMLA for (1) failing to properly designate time off from work by plaintiff as FMLA time, and (2) failing to provide plaintiff with individualized notifications of his rights, obligations and entitlements under the FMLA, under the Second Cause of Action of the Amended Complaint, is GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to plaintiff’s right to file a second amended complaint consistent with the Memorandum dated May 24, 2013, within twenty (20) days if warranted by the facts. 2. Defendant’s Motion is DENIED in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a preliminary pretrial conference will be scheduled in due course. BY THE COURT: /s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois DuBOIS, JAN E., J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?