MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. TAINTER et al
Filing
11
ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (DOCKET NO. 2) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 6/6/13. 6/10/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
________________________________________________
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.,
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
RICHARD O. TAINTER and DIANE E. TAINTER,
:
Defendants.
:
________________________________________________:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-5500
ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2013, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to
Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California [Doc. No. 2] and Plaintiff’s Opposition
thereto [Doc. No. 7], and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it
is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Transfer Venue is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?