MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. TAINTER et al

Filing 11

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (DOCKET NO. 2) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 6/6/13. 6/10/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ________________________________________________ MAACO FRANCHISING, INC., : Plaintiff, : : v. : : RICHARD O. TAINTER and DIANE E. TAINTER, : Defendants. : ________________________________________________: CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-5500 ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2013, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California [Doc. No. 2] and Plaintiff’s Opposition thereto [Doc. No. 7], and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Transfer Venue is DENIED. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?