GRAVES v. ASTRUE

Filing 16

ORDER THAT MATTER IS REMOVED FROM SUSPENSE. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR REVIEW (DOC. 1) IS DENIED AND JUDGMENT SHALL BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 6/10/14. 6/11/14 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-5581 ANTOINETTE GRAVES, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. 0 RD ER AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 2014, upon careful review independent review of the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter (ECF No. 14) , 1 it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The matter is REMOVED from suspense; 2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 3. Plaintiff's Request for Review (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; and 4. JUDGMENT shall be entered in favor Defendant and against Plaintiff . 2 1 The Court undertakes a de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (2012); Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Dominick D'Andrea, Inc., 150 F.3d 245, 250 (3d Cir. 1998). The Court "may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1). In this instance, Defendant has not submitted any objections to Magistrate Judge Rueter's Report and Recommendation. 2 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) gives district courts the "power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. affirming, modifying, or revising the decision of the Secretary, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing." 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?