DAVIS v. SOLID WASTE SERVICES, INC.
Filing
29
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS HEREBY APPROVED AND ADOPTED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (12-5630, NO. 8) IS HEREBY DENIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER (12-5630, NO. 10) IS HEREBY DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR ANSWER (12-5630, NO. 11) IS HEREBY GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 3/25/2013. 3/26/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LAVAR DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
SOLID WASTE SERVICES, INC.,
t/d/b/a J.P. MASCARO & SONS,
Defendant.
BENJAMIN GAY,
Plaintiff,
v.
SOLID WASTE SERVICES, INC.,
t/d/b/a J.P. MASCARO & SONS,
Defendant.
THOMAS BRUCE JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
SOLID WASTE SERVICES, INC.,
t/d/b/a J.P. MASCARO & SONS,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-5628
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-5629
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-5630
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2013, after review of
the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Thomas J. Rueter (ECF No. 28) addressing several of Defendant’s
motions as to Plaintiff Johnson’s Complaint (No. 12-5630, ECF
No. 1),1 it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and
2.
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (No. 12-5630, ECF
ADOPTED;
No. 8) is DENIED;
3.
Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Answer
(No. 12-5630, ECF No. 10) is DENIED; and
4. Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time for Answer (No.
12-5630, ECF No. 11) is GRANTED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
J.
1
The Court undertakes a de novo review of the portions
of the Report and Recommendation to which a party has objected.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2012); Cont’l Cas. Co. v. Dominick
D’Andrea, Inc., 150 F.3d 245, 250 (3d Cir. 1998). The Court “may
accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1). But in this instance, neither party submitted
objections to Magistrate Judge Rueter’s Report and
Recommendation.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?