D.A. NOLT, INC. v. LOCAL UNION NO. 30 UNITED UNION ROOFERS, WATERPROOFERS AND ALLIED WORKERS et al

Filing 41

ORDER to MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (ECF NO. 40) that DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 30) IS GRANTED AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 31) IS DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART.... IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at THE PARTIES MEET AND CONFER REGARDING THE CORRECT DOLLAR AMOUNT THAT PLAINTIFF OWES BASED ON THE REVISED TOTAL NUMBER OF HOURS. ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBE 2,2 015, THE PARTIES MUST SUBMIT A PROPOSED REVISED DOLLAR AMOUNT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 10/22/2015. 10/22/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF.(mo, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA D.A. NOLT, INC., Plaintiff, : : : v. : : LOCAL UNION NO. 30, UNITED UNION : OF ROOFERS, WATERPROOFERS AND : ALLIED WORKERS, et al., : Defendants. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-5810 ORDER AND NOW, on this _22nd__ day of October, 2015, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 30) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 31) is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, Plaintiff’s request to modify the arbitrator’s award to reflect the accurate total number of hours worked by Plaintiff’s non-union employees is GRANTED. The arbitrator’s award is modified to reflect that the total number of hours worked by Plaintiff’s non-union employees is 12,873.75. IT IS FUTHER ORDERED that the parties meet and confer regarding the correct dollar amount that Plaintiff owes based on the revised total number of hours. On or before November 2, 2015, the parties must submit a proposed revised dollar amount. s/Anita B. Brody ______________________________ ANITA B. BRODY, J. Copies VIA ECF on _________ to: Copies MAILED on _______ to:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?