DUTKIEWICZ v. ASTRUE
Filing
17
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW ARE GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT PLAINTIFF SEEKS A REMAND, AND DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS; AND THE CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g). SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 3/7/14. 3/10/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHAD DUTKIEWICZ,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 1
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.
NO. 12-6154
ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2014, upon consideration of Complaint and Request for
Review filed by plaintiff, Chad Dutkiewicz, the record in this case and the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell dated January 27, 2014, no
objections having been filed, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell
dated January 27, 2014, is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2.
Plaintiff=s Request for Review and the relief requested in the Complaint are GRANTED
to the extent that plaintiff seeks a remand to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,
and DENIED in all other respects; and,
3.
The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in
accordance with the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the
Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell dated January 27,
2014.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.
1
Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security in February 14, 2013.
Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin is substituted for
Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this suit.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?