ROBINS v. ASTRUE

Filing 17

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 1/28/14. 1/29/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SALLY A. ROBINS Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant FILED NO. 12-6440 'JAN 2 9 2014 !CHAELE. KUNZ Cltrk ..,,,_ _ , .Clerk ORDER ~ AND NOW, this l. g day of ~ , 2013, after careful review and independent consideration ofthe Plaintiffs request for review, Defendant's response, Plaintiffs reply and review of the Report and Recommendation of Carol Sandra Moore Wells, Chief United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; (2) The Plaintiffs Request for Review is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; (3) The matter be REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security Administration to allow the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to conduct additional proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. On remand, the ALJ shall: (a) explicitly consider Plaintiffs MRI report of February 25, 2011; (b) re-assess Dr. Kennedy's 2010 opinion regarding Plaintiffs physical functional limitations and obtain a new residual functional capacity assessment from an acceptable medical source, (c) re-assess Plaintiffs and Ms. Michela Robins' credibility; (d) reconsider Plaintiffs residual functional capacity; (e) fully develop the record by either contacting Dr. Falgowski for his medical records or obtaining a consultative examination of Plaintiff's mental impairment, and (f) pose hypothetical questions to the vocational expert which take into account all of Plaintiffs credible limitations. It be so ORDERED. ENTERED JAN 29 2014 / OLERKOF COURT PETRESE B. TUCKER, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?