MURRAY v. ASTRUE

Filing 16

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS OBJECTION IS OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPOVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER AND THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR RECONSIDERATION AND FURTHER FINDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS MEMORANDUM; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 8/1/13. 8/1/13 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN E. MURRAY Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-6527 CAROLYNW. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, FILED Defendant. AUG -1 2013 MIC~A&6EJ\UNZ, Clerk ORDER By l..2I:-:=. Oep. Clerk AND NOW, this _L day of August, 2013, upon careful consideration of plaintiffs request for review and the defendant's response thereto, and after careful and independent review of Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart's report and recommendation, defendant's objection thereto, and the plaintiffs response, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's objection is OVERRULED; 2. The report and recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; 3. Plaintiffs request for review is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and JUDGMENT IS ENTERED REVERSING the decision of the Commissioner and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for reconsideration and further findings consistent with this Memorandum.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?