ARNDT et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al

Filing 42

ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOCKET NOS. 14, 15) ARE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 3/5/14. 3/6/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHAWN ARNDT, Plaintiff, : : : : : : : v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-6633 ORDER AND NOW, this 5th day of March, 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Docket No. 8), Defendants’ Opposition thereto (Docket Nos. 24, 25), Plaintiff’s Reply (Docket No. 26), and the supplemental briefing (Docket Nos. 30-32, 34-36, 39), and following oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion (Docket No. 8) is DENIED; 2. All claims against Defendants William Weldon, Ashley McEvoy, Edwin Kuffner, Lorraine Bailer, Rosemary Crane, Gary Benedict, Peter Luther, Colleen Goggins, Tops Markets LLC, and Tops Holding Company are DISMISSED; 3. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 14, 15) are DENIED without prejudice to refile the motions in light of the Court’s opinion on the Motion to Remand. The remaining Defendants shall answer or otherwise move no later than 21 days from the date of this Order. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?