FARVARDIN v. SROMOVSKY et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT NOONAN'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR LACK OF CASE OR CONTROVERSY [#32] IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PARTIES SHALL SUBMIT PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON OR BEFORE 11/7/14. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 10/21/14. 10/22/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TPR. MICHAEL SANTOS, et al.,
AND NOW, this 21st day of October 2014, upon consideration of Defendant Noonan’s
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Request for Injunctive Relief for Lack of Case or Controversy
[Doc. No. 32], and Plaintiff’s Response thereto, and after hearing testimony relevant to the issues
raised at a bench trial held on August 5 and 6, 2014, and for the reasons set forth in the
accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that the parties shall submit proposed findings of fact and
conclusions of law on or before November 7, 2014.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/Cynthia M. Rufe
CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?