LENNON v. SHARON HILL BOROUGH et al

Filing 34

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS TO DEFENDANTS SCANLAN, HENDRICK AND THE BOROUGH OF SHARON HILL. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS TO DEFENDANTS MUMMO, ATTIX, HERRON AND TINSLEY ON PLAIN TIFFS CLAIMS OF FALSE ARREST, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, CONSPIRACY AND MALICIOUS PROSECUTION. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIM OF INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 4/10/14. 4/10/14 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED(rf, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES LENNON

CIVIL ACTION
v.

NO. 12-6701

SHARON HILL BOROUGH, et al.

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2014, upon careful consideration of
Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 26), the briefs and exhibits
submitted by both parties, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it
is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Defendants
Scanlan, Hendrick and the Borough of Sharon Hill.
2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Defendants
Mummo, Attix, Herron and Tinsley on Plaintiff’s claims of false arrest, false
imprisonment, conspiracy and malicious prosecution.
3. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s
claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 12\12-6701 LENNON V. SHARON HILL BORO\12CV6701.ORDER.SJM.DOCX