DISTEFANO v. MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.
ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. PLFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY IS DENIED AS MOOT.SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 3/31/14. 4/1/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MACY’S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.
AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2014, after consideration of defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (paper no. 35), plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (papers no. 36
and 37), defendant’s Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (paper no. 44), defendant’s
Supplemental Authority in Further Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (paper no. 47),
and plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to the Supplemental Motion (paper no. 48), and for the
reasons stated in the attached memorandum of today’s date, it is ORDERED that:
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (paper no. 35) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine to Preclude Testimony (paper no. 39) is DENIED
/s/ Norma L. Shapiro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?