TAHA v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al

Filing 147

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 3/28/16. 3/28/16 ENTERED AND E-MAILED, MAILED TO UNREP.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DARYOUSH TAHA,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION

v.
BUCKS COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA,
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY, and UNPUBLISH LLC,
Defendants.

NO. 12-6867

UNPUBLISH LLC
Cross Defendant
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP
Cross Claimant
v.
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY RECORDS/ RECORDS
CUSTODIAN EMPLOYEES JANE
AND/OR JOHN DOE #1-6, BUCKS
COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, TERRANCE
P. MOORE, FRANK NOONAN and
WILLIAM F. PLANTIER
Cross Defendants
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants the County
of Bucks and the Bucks County Correctional Facility Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.
105), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 114), and Defendants’ Reply in
Support thereof (ECF No. 117); Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 123)
and Defendants’ Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 128); a transcript of oral argument
held April 24, 2015 (ECF No. 137); and supplemental briefing submitted by both parties (ECF
Nos. 124, 125, 131, 133, 134, 136), it is HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED. With respect to the
sole issue presented by Plaintiff, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s criminal history record
information was wrongfully disseminated to the public in violation of the provisions of
Pennsylvania’s Criminal History Record Information Act; and
2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:

/S/ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
_______________________________
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

2