TAHA v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al

Filing 268

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 2/14/19. 2/14/19 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION DARYOUSH TAHA, Plaintiff, v. NO. 12-6867 BUCKS COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, and UNPUBLISH LLC, Defendants. UNPUBLISH LLC Cross Defendant BENSALEM TOWNSHIP Cross Claimant ..... v. \,. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY RECORDS/ RECORDS CUSTODIAN EMPLOYEES JANE AND/OR JOHN DOE #1-6, BUCKS COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, TERRANCE P. MOORE, FRANK NOONAN and WILLIAM F. PLANTIER Cross Defendants i f ., ORDER AND NOW this 14th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment and briefing in support (ECF Nos. 234,253), Defendants' Response therfto (ECF No. 251 ), Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and briefing in support (ECF N1s. 232, 257), Plaintiffs Response thereto (ECF No. 247), and the parties' responses to the Cour('s I Order to Show Cause (ECF Nos. 260,261,264), IT IS ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED. WENDY BEETLESTONE, J. --•'If;. ..,' I 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?