TAHA v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
Filing
268
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 2/14/19. 2/14/19 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION
DARYOUSH TAHA,
Plaintiff,
v.
NO. 12-6867
BUCKS COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA,
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY, and UNPUBLISH LLC,
Defendants.
UNPUBLISH LLC
Cross Defendant
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP
Cross Claimant
.....
v.
\,.
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY RECORDS/ RECORDS
CUSTODIAN EMPLOYEES JANE
AND/OR JOHN DOE #1-6, BUCKS
COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, TERRANCE
P. MOORE, FRANK NOONAN and
WILLIAM F. PLANTIER
Cross Defendants
i
f
.,
ORDER
AND NOW this 14th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Motion for
Summary Judgment and briefing in support (ECF Nos. 234,253), Defendants' Response therfto
(ECF No. 251 ), Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and briefing in support (ECF N1s.
232, 257), Plaintiffs Response thereto (ECF No. 247), and the parties' responses to the Cour('s
I
Order to Show Cause (ECF Nos. 260,261,264), IT IS ORDERED that the Motions are
DENIED.
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
--•'If;.
..,'
I
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?