TAHA v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
Filing
71
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT CITIZEN INFORMATION ASSOCIATES (CIA)'S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 3/25/14. 3/26/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS, E-MAILED.(jl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION
DARYOUSH TAHA
Individually and on Behalf of
All Others Similarly Situated
v.
,....,..,~
NO. 12-68~ ~.'" , i ..•
BUCKS COUNTY, et al.
J
MAR 2 6 2014
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2014, upon consideration ofDefendani,_~i~~gL: .. ~· ~ ..<
Information Associates (CIA)'s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 54),
Plaintiffs Response (Doc. 59), and CIA's Reply (Doc. 62), it is hereby ORDERED that the
Motion (Doc. 54) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:
1. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Counts I and II. Plaintiffs claims against
CIA pursuant to 18 Pa. C.S.A. §§ 9121and9183 are DISMISSED with prejudice.
2. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Count III. Plaintiffs claim against CIA
pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 8316 is DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. The Motion is DENIED with respect to Count IV.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Third Amended
Complaint consistent with this Court's Memorandum within fifteen (15) days of this Order.
BY THE COURT:
UNENTSE~~6ISTRICT JUDGE
MAR 2 6 20\4
CLERK OF COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?