GIORDANO v. MURANO-NIX et al

Filing 24

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 16 , THE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE THERETO, AND FOLLOWING AN ORAL ARGUMENT ON 12/17/2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, FOR THE REASONS STATED IN A MEMORANDUM OF LAW BEARING T ODAY'S DATE, THAT THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF ON THESE CLAIMS. THIS CASE IS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 1/7/14. 1/8/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY GIORDANO v. MARGARET MURANO-NIX, et al. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-7034 ORDER AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2014, upon consideration of the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 16), the plaintiff’s response thereto, and following an oral argument on December 17, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today’s date, that the defendant’s motion is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby ENTERED in favor of the above-named defendant and against the plaintiff on these claims. This case is closed. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mary A. McLaughlin MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?