AT&T CORP. et al v. CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al

Filing 48

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IS GRANTED, PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 65 (a)(2), THE COURT CONSOLIDATES THE ORAL ARGUMENT WITH A HEARING ON THE MERITS IN THIS CASE. THE DEFENDANTS ARE PERMANENTLY ENJOINED FROM ENFORCING THE PPUC'S 12/5/12 ORDER AND AUGUST 8/15/13. THE PLAINTIFF IS NOT OBLIGATED TO MAKE ANY PAYMENTS UNDER THE TERMS OF THE PPUC ORDERS; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 1/30/14. 1/31/14 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT&T CORP., et al. v. CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-7157 ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2014, upon consideration of the plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 20), the oppositions and reply thereto, and following an oral argument held on October 1, 2013, and whereas the parties agreed during oral argument that the record was complete and the Court could proceed to decide the case on the merits, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2), the Court consolidates the oral argument with a hearing on the merits in this case; 2. The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“PPUC”) lacked jurisdiction to issue its December 5, 2012 Opinion and Order (“December 5, 2012 Order”) and August 15, 2013 Opinion and Order on Reconsideration (“August 15, 2013 Order”), which ordered AT&T to pay Core Communications, Inc. in the amount of $254,029.89, the rate of $0.0007/MOU for the traffic at issue in this case; and 3. The defendants are permanently enjoined from enforcing the PPUC’s December 5, 2012 Order and August 15, 2013 Order. The plaintiff is not obligated to make any payments under the terms of the PPUC Orders. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mary A. McLaughlin MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?