MODICA v. MAPLE MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION et al
ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 24) IS GRANTED. MOTIONS IN LIMINE (DOCKET NOS. 31, 32, 33, 34 AND 39) ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. CROSS-CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 14, 2014 IS CANCELED AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 1/31/14. 1/31/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, ) .
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MAPLE MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION et al.,
AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2014, upon consideration of Maple Meadows
Homeowners Association’s (“Maple Meadows”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No.
24) and Ms. Modica’s Response thereto (Docket No. 25), it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
The Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 24) IS GRANTED;
accordingly, the outstanding Motions in Limine (Docket Nos. 31, 32, 33, 34 & 39)
are DISMISSED AS MOOT;
because each of Maple Meadows’ and CLC Landscapes, Inc.’s (“CLC”) crossclaims (Docket Nos. 4, 11) against the other was contingent upon the crossclaimant’s liability to Ms. Modica, the cross-claims are DISMISSED without
the final pretrial conference scheduled for February 14, 2014, is canceled; and
the Clerk of Court shall MARK THIS CASE CLOSED for all purposes,
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge
The parties stipulated to the dismissal without prejudice of claims against CLC (Docket No.
23), so neither Maple Meadows nor CLC has a claim, any longer, against the other.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?