STRICKLAND v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al

Filing 12

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 5/16/13. 5/16/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-119

KEVIN STRICKLAND,
Petitioner,

v.
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION
AND PAROLE, et al.,
Respondents.
0 R DE R
of

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2013, after
the Report and Recommendation of United States

·.Thomas J. Rueter (ECF No. 11) , 1 , it is hereby ORDERED as !follows:
(1) The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED

~

ADOPTED;

d

F No.

(2) The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
1) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
(3) A certificate of appealability shall not
and

The court undertakes a de novo review of the p rtions
of the Report and Recommendation to which a party has o?'ected.
See 28 u.s.c. § 636 (b) (1) (2012); Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Dotn'nick
07Andrea, Inc., 150 F.3d 245, 250 (3d Cir. 1998). The cb rt
accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the f indfi
recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S. c
§ 636(b) (1). In this instance, neither party submitted
objections to Magistrate Judge Rueter's Report and

1

I

1

•

Recommendation.

(5) The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

cE~rJ'~

2