HOWARD v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al

Filing 35

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. DEFENDANT METROPOLITAN REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 10/24/2013. 10/24/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Theresa Howard, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : Philadelphia Housing Authority; : Metropolitan Regional Council of : Carpenters and Joiners of America, aka : United Brotherhood of Carpenters & : Joiners; Edward Coryell, Sr. (officially : and individually); and Mark Durkalec : (officially and individually) : : Defendants. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-cv-00374 ORDER RE DENIAL OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2013: 1. Upon consideration of Defendant Philadelphia Housing Authority’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 20) and Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to the Motion (ECF 32), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Philadelphia Housing Authority’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. 2. Upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Metropolitan Regional Council of Carpenters and Joiners of America, aka United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Edward Coryell, Sr. (officially and individually), and Mark Durkalec (officially and individually) (ECF 25), and Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to the Motion (ECF 33), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART, as to the Title VII claims against Edward Coryell, Sr., and Mark Durkalec in their individual capacities, and DENIED IN PART as to the remainder of the Motion. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson _______________________________ MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 13\13-374 howard v. PHA\13cv374 Order Denying PHA & Union Mot to Dimsiss 10.23.13.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?