HOWARD v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. DEFENDANT METROPOLITAN REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 10/24/2013. 10/24/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Philadelphia Housing Authority;
Metropolitan Regional Council of
Carpenters and Joiners of America, aka :
United Brotherhood of Carpenters &
Joiners; Edward Coryell, Sr. (officially :
and individually); and Mark Durkalec
(officially and individually)
ORDER RE DENIAL OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2013:
Upon consideration of Defendant Philadelphia Housing Authority’s Motion to
Dismiss (ECF 20) and Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to the Motion (ECF 32), it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendant Philadelphia Housing Authority’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.
Upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Metropolitan
Regional Council of Carpenters and Joiners of America, aka United Brotherhood of Carpenters
& Joiners, Edward Coryell, Sr. (officially and individually), and Mark Durkalec (officially and
individually) (ECF 25), and Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to the Motion (ECF 33), it is
hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART, as to the
Title VII claims against Edward Coryell, Sr., and Mark Durkalec in their individual capacities,
and DENIED IN PART as to the remainder of the Motion.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 13\13-374 howard v. PHA\13cv374 Order Denying PHA & Union Mot to Dimsiss
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?