BAUTISTA v. ASTRUE
OPINION ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 26 ), IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE RELIEF REQUESTED IN PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF AND STATEMENT OF ISSUES IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR REVIEW (DOC. NO. 4 ), IS DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT CAROLYN W. COLVIN AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF GRISEL BAUTISTS O/B/B J.L.R. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 8/10/2015. 8/10/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GRISEL BAUTISTA o/b/o J.L.R.,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
AND NOW, this 10th day of August 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Complaint
(Doc. No. 3), Defendant’s Answer to the Complaint (Doc. No. 9), Plaintiff’s Brief and Statement
of Issues In Support of Request for Review (Doc. No. 14), Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s
Request for Review (Doc. No. 15), United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. No. 26), and Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation
(Doc. No. 28), it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 26) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The relief requested in Plaintiff’s Brief and Statement of Issues In Support of Request for
Review (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED.
3. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin and against Plaintiff Grisel
Bautista o/b/o J.L.R.
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/ s / J oel H. S l om s k y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?