BROWN v. BEARD et al

Filing 48

ORDER AS FOLLOWS: THE REPORT ABD RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; AND PLFF'S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/30/13. 7/31/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALTON D. BROWN,

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Petitioner,
v.
JEFFREY A. BEARD, et al.,
Respondents.

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-465

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2013, after review of
the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Thomas J. Rueter (ECF No. 11),1 it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
(1) The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and
ADOPTED; and
(2) Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining
Order and Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 26) is DENIED AS MOOT.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
J.

1

The Court undertakes a de novo review of the portions
of the Report and Recommendation to which a party has objected.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2006 & Supp. V 2011); Cont’l Cas. Co.
v. Dominick D’Andrea, Inc., 150 F.3d 245, 250 (3d Cir. 1998).
The Court “may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part,
the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.”
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In this instance, neither party submitted
objections to Magistrate Judge Rueter’s Report and
Recommendation.