HANNIBAL v. WETZEL et al

Filing 65

ORDERED THAT: 1) THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; 2) THE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS FILED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.§ 2254 IS DENIED; 3) A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS ISSUED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 10/6/2021. 10/6/2021 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHELDON HANNIBAL v. : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-cv-619 : ROBERT GILMORE, et al. : ORDER This 6th day of October, 2021, following careful and independent consideration of the petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 2254 by Sheldon Hannibal, Petitioner, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, and the objections raised by Petitioner’s counsel, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1) The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2) The petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 2254 is DENIED; 3) A certificate of appealability is issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2253 as to two issues raised by Petitioner where he made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, and reasonable minds could differ about how to resolve the claims. See 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). These include: 1. Whether there is a reasonable probability that evidence suppressed in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 363 U.S. 83 (1963) would have materially impeached the credibility of the main witness, and; 2. Whether the trial was fundamentally unfair such that Petitioner was denied his right to due process, when the Commonwealth was permitted to introduce evidence of the murder of Tanesha Robinson, a witness against Petitioner, allegedly at Petitioner’s behest. /s/ Gerald Austin McHugh United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?