RAUSO v. FEIN et al

Filing 102

ORDER THAT THE PLFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DENIED. THE DEFTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE GRANTED. THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC.NO. 75) IS STRICKEN. THIS CASE SHALL REMAIN IN CIVIL SUSPENSE.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/2/17. 8/2/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GENNARO RAUSO,
Individually and as assignee for Elliotte B.
Brown, Twenty Six Schappert Terrace,
LLC, and D & B Property Investors
Corp.,
Plaintiff,
v.
BARBARA FEIN, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 13-cv-693

ORDER
AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2017, upon consideration of the defendants’
motions to dismiss the second amended complaint (Docket Nos. 87, 88, and 90), and the
plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (Docket No. 95), it is
hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is
DENIED.
2. The defendants’ motions to dismiss the second amended complaint are
GRANTED.
3. The second amended complaint (Docket No. 75) is STRICKEN.
4. This case shall remain in civil suspense.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, C.J.