RAUSO v. FEIN et al

Filing 137

ORDER THAT upon consideration of Defendants motions to dismiss, [ECF 117 and 127], Plaintiffs response in opposition thereto, [ECF 132], Defendants reply, [ECF 135], and the allegations in the amended complaint, [ECF 18], it is hereby ORDERED that, f or the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the motions to dismiss, [ECF 117 and 127], are GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED as to all remaining Defendants. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 12/21/2022. 12/21/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg)

Download PDF
Case 2:13-cv-00693-NIQA Document 137 Filed 12/21/22 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GENNARO RAUSO Plaintiff, pro se v. BARBARA FEIN, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0693 ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of December 2022, upon consideration of Defendants’ motions to dismiss, [ECF 117 and 127], Plaintiff’s response in opposition thereto, [ECF 132], Defendants’ reply, [ECF 135], and the allegations in the amended complaint, [ECF 18], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the motions to dismiss, [ECF 117 and 127], are GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED as to all remaining Defendants. BY THE COURT: /s/ Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO Judge, United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?