RAUSO v. FEIN et al
Filing
137
ORDER THAT upon consideration of Defendants motions to dismiss, [ECF 117 and 127], Plaintiffs response in opposition thereto, [ECF 132], Defendants reply, [ECF 135], and the allegations in the amended complaint, [ECF 18], it is hereby ORDERED that, f or the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the motions to dismiss, [ECF 117 and 127], are GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED as to all remaining Defendants. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 12/21/2022. 12/21/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg)
Case 2:13-cv-00693-NIQA Document 137 Filed 12/21/22 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GENNARO RAUSO
Plaintiff, pro se
v.
BARBARA FEIN, et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-0693
ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of December 2022, upon consideration of Defendants’ motions
to dismiss, [ECF 117 and 127], Plaintiff’s response in opposition thereto, [ECF 132], Defendants’
reply, [ECF 135], and the allegations in the amended complaint, [ECF 18], it is hereby ORDERED
that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the motions to dismiss,
[ECF 117 and 127], are GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED as to all remaining
Defendants.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro
NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO
Judge, United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?