RAUSO v. FEIN et al
Filing
85
ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION TO REASSIGN THE INSTANT MOTION, SEEKING TO RECUSE JUDGE LAWRENCE STENGEL, TO ANOTHER JUDGE FOR DISPOSITION, TO REMOVE THIS CASE FROM CIVIL SUSPENSE, RENDER AN ADJUDICATION ON THE MERITS OF ALL OF PLFF'S CLAIMS AND R ELIEF REQUESTED AND SECOND MOTION TO RESCING AND OR VACATE THIS COURT'S 5/11/15 AND 8/10/15 ORDERS (DOC. NO. 76) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/22/17. 3/22/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GENNARO RAUSO,
Individually and as assignee for Elliotte B.
Brown, Twenty Six Schappert Terrace,
LLC, and D & B Property Investors
Corp.,
Plaintiff,
v.
BARBARA FEIN, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 13-cv-693
ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2017, upon consideration of the plaintiff’s
Motion to Reassign the Instant Motion, Seeking to Recuse Judge Lawrence Stengel, To
Another Judge For Disposition, To Remove This Case From Civil Suspense, Render an
Adjudication on the Merits of all of Plaintiffs’ Claims and Relief Requested and Second
Motion to Rescind and or Vacate This Court’s May 11, 2015 and August 10, 2015 Orders
(Docket No. 76), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?