FERGUSON v. PATHMARK et al

Filing 45

ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS OUTLINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR POST-TRIAL RELIEF IN THE FORM OF A NEW TRIAL OR REMITTITUR (DOC. NO. 34 ), IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 12/16/2013. 12/16/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BARBARA FERGUSON
v.
THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC
TEA CO., INC., ET AL.

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 13-778

ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2013, upon consideration of Defendants’ “Motion
for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or, In the Alternative, Motion for Post-Trial Relief in
the form of a New Trial or Remittitur” (Docket No. 34), and Plaintiff’s response thereto, and for
the reasons set forth in the accompany Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
Motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John R. Padova, J.
John R. Padova, J.