LEAMAN v. WOLFE
Filing
85
ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, PLFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 75) IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART & DEFT GREGG B. WOLFE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 76) IS DENIED, ETC. JUDGMENT SHALL BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLFF & AGAINST DEFT IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $38,873.32. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JOY FLOWERS CONTI ON 2/9/17. 2/9/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JANICE M. LEAMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
GREGG B. WOLFE,
Defendant.
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-CV-00975
) United States District Court for the
) Eastern District of Pennsylvania
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW this 9th day of February, 2017, upon consideration of the parties' crossmotions for summary judgment after remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that for the reasons
set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion, plaintiff Janice M. Leaman's motion for
summary judgment (ECF No. 75) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and
defendant Gregg B. Wolfe's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 76) is DENIED. Plaintiff
is entitled to recover damages of $10,523.97 for interest and reasonable attorneys' fees of
$28,349.35. Judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff Janice M. Leaman and against
defendant Gregg B. Wolfe in the total amount of $38,873.32.
BY THE COURT:
Isl Joy Flowers Conti
Joy Flowers Conti
Chief Judge, U.S. District Court
18
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?