EDWARDS v. WALSH et al
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S MOTION (DOC. NO. 32) IS DENIED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALALBILITY WILL NOT ISSUE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 7/9/15. 7/9/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd) Modified on 7/9/2015 (lisad, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARK ANTHONY EDWARDS,
JEROME WALSH, et al.,
AND NOW, this 9th day of July 2015, upon consideration of Petitioner’s Motion for
60(b)(6) Relief (Doc. No. 32), Respondent’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 37), and in
accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED that the Motion (Doc.
No. 32) is DENIED. A certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists
would not debate the propriety of the Court’s ruling. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v.
McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The Clerk of Court shall close the above-captioned case.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joel H. Slomsky
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?