JONES v. ARIA HEALTH

Filing 13

ORDER THAT THE 7 MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS THE MOTION IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO COUNT I. THE MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO COUNT II, WHICH IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPL AINT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AND SHOULD BE GUIDED BY THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION. THE MOTION IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO COUNT III. DEFENDANTS REQUEST TO STRIKE PATTERN AND PRACTICE ALLEGATIONS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/2/14. 1/6/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (mas, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEAN ELIZABETH JONES, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-1090 ARIA HEALTH, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 2nd day of January, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket #7), Plaintiff’s response, and all supporting briefs, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. The Motion is DENIED with respect to Count I. 2. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Count II, which is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within thirty days and should be guided by the accompanying memorandum opinion. 3. The Motion is DENIED with respect to Count III. 4. Defendant’s request to strike pattern and practice allegations is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?