CREDICO v. WEST GOSHEN POLICE et al

Filing 52

ORDER: DEFTS CHESTER COUNTY SHERIFF AND CHESTER COUNTY'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) IS GRANTED; DEFTS DETECTIVE DAVID MAURER AND WEST GOSHEN POLICE'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLFF'S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) IS GRANTED; ALL CLAIMS IN PRO SE PLFF JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO'S COMPLAINT IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MATTER ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 11/18/13. 11/19/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO

:
:
:
:
:

v.
WEST GOSHEN POLICE, et al.

CIVIL ACTION
No. 13-1255

ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2013, for the reasons set forth in the
accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED:
Defendants Chester County Sheriff and Chester County’s Motion to Dismiss the
Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Document 22) is GRANTED;
Defendants Detective David Maurer and West Goshen Police’s Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Document 28) is
GRANTED;
All claims in pro se Plaintiff Justin Michael Credico’s Complaint in the abovecaptioned matter are DISMISSED with prejudice;1
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED.

1

Along with the reasons set forth in the accompany memorandum, this Court is compelled to
note another reason why these claims must be dismissed with prejudice. Credico is a frequent
litigant in this Court and has a history of filing frivolous and legally unintelligible documents.
Over the past three years, Credico has engaged in a campaign of harassment, filing forty-one
cases in this District alone. His conduct continues despite repeated defeats and admonitions. The
Court has spent much time in resolving these frivolous lawsuits. It must protect its limited
resources to ensure they are allocated so as to promote and protect the interests of justice. As
such, continuously granting leave to amend would not only be inequitable to the defendants but
also this Court.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.

2

s