TAYLOR v. CAMERON
Filing
51
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 47) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. 3) IS DISMISSED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS ACTION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 7/31/18. 7/31/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KEVIN TAYLOR,
Petitioner,
v.
KENNETH CAMERON, et al.,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civ. No. 13-1262
ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2018, upon careful and independent consideration of
Kevin Taylor’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 3), Respondents’ Updated
Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 44), Taylor’s Reply (Doc. No. 45),
Judge Perkin’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 47) to which there are no objections, and
available state court records, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 47) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 3) is DISMISSED;
3. A Certificate of Appealability shall NOT ISSUE because Petition has not made a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that
reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of this ruling. See 28 U.S.C. §
2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and
4. The CLERK OF COURT shall CLOSE this action.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Paul S. Diamond
_______________________
Paul S. Diamond, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?