DADE v. GAUDENZIA, DCR., INC. et al

Filing 21

ORDER THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: PLFF'S CLAIM UNDER 42 U.S.C. SEC. 1983 BASED ON THE HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1996 IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE WITH RESPECT TO ALL DEFTS. PLFF&# 039;S CLAIM UNDER 42 U.S.C. SEC. 1983 BASED ON THE EIGHT AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH RESPECT TO DEFTS GAUDENZIA DRC, INC., AND MELVIN THOMPSON. THE BALANCE OF DEFTS' MOTION IS DENIED. PLFF IS GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 7/3/13. 7/8/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LEROY W. DADE, JR., Plaintiff, v. GAUDENZIA DRC, INC., et al. Defendants. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-1381 ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of July, 2013, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by defendants, Gaudenzia DRC, Inc., Shakiya Drummond, Sharronna Holmes, Melvin Thompson, Erin Sutton, and Patricia O’Connor (Doc. # 12), and plaintiff’s response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with respect to all defendants. 2. Plaintiff’s claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on the Eight Amendment to the United States Constitution is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with respect to defendants Gaudenzia DRC, Inc., and Melvin Thompson. 3. The balance of defendants’ motion is DENIED. 4. Plaintiff is given leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. /s/ William H. Yohn Jr., Judge William H. Yohn Jr., Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?