LIM v. RAJAN et al

Filing 24

ORDER THAT MOTION OF MATHU RAJAN TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT IS GRANTED UNDER RULE 12(b)(1) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION; THE MOTION OF STV NETWORKS, INC. TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IS GRANTED AS TO ALL CLAIMS ARISING ON OR BEFORE 3/15/2009; & THE MOTION OF STV NETWORKS, INC. IS DENIED AS TO ALL CLAIMS ARISING ON OR AFTER 3/16/2009.SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 9/18/13. 9/18/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DAVID BOHYEON LIM
v.
MATHU RAJAN, et al.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 13-1385

ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2013, for the
reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
(1)

the motion of Mathu Rajan to dismiss the complaint

(Doc. #16) is GRANTED under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure for lack of subject matter jurisdiction;
(2)

the motion of STV Networks, Inc. to dismiss the

complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure (Doc. #17) is GRANTED as to all claims arising on or
before March 15, 2009; and
(3)

the motion of STV Networks, Inc. (Doc. #17) is

DENIED as to all claims arising on or after March 16, 2009.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III
J.