PRILLERMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 60) IS GRANTED. PLFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. NO. 51) IS DENIED AS THERE IS NO BASIS FOR LIABILITY AGAINST COMMISSIONER GIORLA. PLFF'S MOTION FOR COURT TO CALL WITNESS ES AT REQUEST OF PLFF. (DOC. NO. 52) IS DENIED AS THE COURT HAS BASED ITS SUMMARY JUDGMENT RULING ON FACTS AS STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 8/10/16. 8/11/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., MAILED AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN. Modified on 8/11/2016 (pr, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
FRANKLYN DEVON PRILLERMAN :
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-1414
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
AND NOW, this 10th day of August 2016, upon consideration of the pending motions
and any responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion,
it is hereby ORDERED :
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 60] is GRANTED.
Summary Judgment is ENTERED in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration [Doc. No. 51] is DENIED as there is no
basis for liability against Commissioner Giorla.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Court to Call Witnesses at Request of Plaintiff [Doc. No.
52] is DENIED as the Court has based its summary judgment ruling on facts as stipulated by the
The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the case.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/Cynthia M. Rufe
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?