COLES et al v. RITZ CARLTON RESIDENCE et al
ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 4) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS ARE GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AND SERVE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 20 DAYS. IF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IS FILED, DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE AND SERVE THEIR RESPONSES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL AND LOCAL RULES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 6/12/2013. 6/14/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (aeg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANTHONY COLES and
RITZ CARLTON RESIDENCE and
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2013, upon consideration of plaintiffs’ first amended
complaint (paper no. 3), defendants’ motion to dismiss (paper no. 4), plaintiffs’ response in
opposition (paper no. 10), and defendants’ reply brief (paper no. 15), following a conference
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 held on May 13, 2013, at which the parties were
heard, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED that:
The motion to dismiss (paper no. 4) is GRANTED.
Plaintiffs are given leave to file and serve a second amended complaint stating a
plausible claim of contract interference under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 within twenty
(20) days of this order.
If an amended complaint is filed, defendants shall file and serve their responses in
accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this
/s/ Norma L. Shapiro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?