BOARDMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Filing
127
ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO ENTERED JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST BROWN'S. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 2/2/2015. 2/3/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION
MARY BOARDMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 13-1499
BROWN'S SUPER STORES, et
al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
February 2, 2015
TIMOTHY R. RICE
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AND NOW, on February 2, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff Mary
Boardman's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (doc. 124) and Defendant Brown's Super
Stores' Response (doc. 125), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED. As explained in my accompanying Memorandum
Opinion, the jury lacked sufficient evidence to find that Brown's did not falsely
imprison Boardman in violation of Pennsylvania law.
2. The Clerk of Courts is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against
Brown's.
c
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?