MOORE v. RITE AID HDQTRS CORP. et al

Filing 76

ORDER THAT PART OF DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) SEEKING TO DISMISS NAMED PLFF KYRA MOORE'S INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS IN COUNT I OF THE FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT IS GRANTED & THOSE CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THAT PART OF DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) SEEKING TO DISMISS THE CLAIMS OF THE PUTATIVE CLASS IN COUNT I OF THE FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT IS GRANTED & THOSE CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFT'S ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLFF'S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION IS DENIED, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 12/20/17. 12/21/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KYRA MOORE, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 13-1515 RITE AID HDQTRS CORP., doing business as “RITE AID CORPORATION,” Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2017, upon consideration of plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification (Doc. No. 54, filed August 2, 2016), plaintiff’s Praecipe to Substitute the Proposed Order to Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification (Doc. No. 56, filed August 5, 2016), defendant’s Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification (Doc. Nos. 57-58, filed September 9 and 12, 2016), plaintiff’s Reply in Further Support of Her Motion for Class Certification (Doc. No. 60, filed September 30, 2016), defendant’s Sur-Reply in Further Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification (Doc. No. 64, filed October 14, 2016), defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 65, 67, filed December 6-7, 2016), defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 66, filed December 7, 2016), plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant Rite Aid Hdqrtrs. Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 69, filed December 23, 2016), plaintiff’s Response to Defendant Rite Aid’s Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 70, filed December 23, 2016), defendant’s Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 71-72, filed January 5-6, 2017), and plaintiff’s Notice of Supplemental Authority in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify Class and in Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 74, filed August 16, 2017), for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum dated December 20, 2017, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That part of defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) seeking to dismiss named plaintiff Kyra Moore’s individual claims in Count I of the First Amended Class Action Complaint is GRANTED and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 2. That part of defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) seeking to dismiss the claims of the putative class in Count I of the First Amended Class Action Complaint is GRANTED and those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3. Defendant’s alternative Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as MOOT; 4. Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification is DENIED; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a telephone conference for the purpose of scheduling further proceedings will be conducted in due course. BY THE COURT: /s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois DuBOIS, JAN E., J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?