SCOTT v. WALSH et al
ORDER: THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE INSOFAR AS IT RAISES CLAIMS NOT COGNIZABLE U NDER 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2254 AND IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 2/7/14. 2/10/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JEROME WALSH, et al.
O R D ER
AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2014, upon careful consideration Petitioner Steven
Scott’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. 1), the May 30,
2013 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (ECF No. 10),
Petitioner’s Objections thereto (ECF No. 11), ), and for the reasons in the accompanying
Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED:
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 10) is APPROVED and
Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 11)
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED with
prejudice insofar as it raises claims not cognizable under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and is DENIED with
prejudice in all other respects.
There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter as CLOSED for
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 13\13-1552 scott v. walsh et al\13cv1552.scott.randr.denied.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?