RULIS et al v. LA FITNESS et al

Filing 26

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. NO.22) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO.21) IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 9/27/2013. 9/27/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED (kk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEVIN M. RULIS, et al., Plaintiffs, : : : : : : : v. LA FITNESS, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION No. 13-1582 ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2013, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand, Defendants’ response thereto, Plaintiffs’ reply thereon, and for the reasons provided in this Court’s Memorandum dated September 27, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Document No. 22) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Document No. 21) is DENIED AS MOOT. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. BY THE COURT: Berle M. Schiller, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?