RULIS et al v. LA FITNESS et al
ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS' 28 MOTION TO REMAND IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE COURT GRANTS PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST TO REMAND THIS CASE TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. THE COURT DENIES PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 3/24/15. 3/25/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KEVIN M. RULIS and
BENEDICTE E. DUCHEN-RULIS,
AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2015, on consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand
(Document No. 28), and the responses thereto, and for the reasons provided in this Court’s
Memorandum dated March 24, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED that:
The motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
The Court grants Plaintiffs’ request to remand this case to the Court of Common
Pleas of Philadelphia County.
The Court denies Plaintiffs’ request for attorneys’ fees and costs.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
BY THE COURT:
Berle M. Schiller, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?