CODADA v. GRACE ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE INC. et al
Filing
51
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 3/12/2014. 3/14/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HARRY CODADA,
v.
GRACE ADULT DAY HEALTH
CARE INC., and TATIANA MATSVEYEVA.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 13-2003
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment, Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment,
and Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition, and following a hearing held on March 6, 2014, at which
the parties were heard, it appearing that there are disputed issues to be decided by the finder of fact:
It is ORDERED that defendants’ Motion is DENIED.
/s/ Norma L. Shapiro
J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
