LANNETT COMPANY, INC. et al v. ASHERMAN

Filing 28

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE ACTION IS TRANSFERRED TO THE US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING. THE MOTION IS HELD IN ABEYANCE, IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, UNTIL THIS ACTION IS TRANSFERRED TO THE US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 2/24/14. 2/25/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LANNETT COMPANY, INC. and ARTHUR BEDROSIAN v. RICHARD ASHERMAN : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2006 ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 9), and all documents filed in connection therewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion is DENIED insofar as it seeks to dismiss the case for improper venue pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 2. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming for the convenience of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a); 3. The action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming; and 4. The Motion is held in ABEYANCE, in all other respects, until this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming. BY THE COURT: _/s/ John R. Padova_____________ John R. Padova, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?