SHORT v. BURNS et al

Filing 28

ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A SUBPOENA DU CES TECEM IS DENIED. THE PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR THE PRODUCTION OF MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS IS DENIED. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 12/17/13. 12/19/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(lvj, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HARVEY P. SHORT, Petitioner vs. DANIEL P. BURNS, et al., Respondents : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2236 ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2013, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Document #1), and after review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice (Document #18), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The petitioner’s objections (Document #23) are OVERRULED. 2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice. 4. The petitioner’s motion for the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum (Documents #14 and #15) is DENIED.1 5. The petitioner’s motion for the production of mental health records (Document #20) is DENIED. 6. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability. 7. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED for all purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J. 1 Because I am dismissing it without prejudice as unexhausted, I find that the requested documents and mental health records are unnecessary to the disposition of this petition. Accordingly, I will deny both motions.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?