SUTTON v. LAMAS et al

Filing 22

ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 6/18/14. 6/19/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, MAILED AND E-MAILED AND 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LEWIS SUTTON CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 13-2240 MARIROSA LAMAS, et al. O R D ER AND NOW, this 18th day of June, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart, and Petitioner’s Objections, and for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum, it is ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s Objections are overruled. 2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. 4. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. 5. The Clerk shall close this case. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson _______________________________ MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 13\13-2240 sutton v. lamas\13cv2240.061814.order.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?