SUTTON v. LAMAS et al
Filing
22
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 6/18/14. 6/19/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, MAILED AND E-MAILED AND 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LEWIS SUTTON
CIVIL ACTION
v.
NO. 13-2240
MARIROSA LAMAS, et al.
O R D ER
AND NOW, this 18th day of June, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the
petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart, and Petitioner’s Objections, and for the reasons stated in the
foregoing Memorandum, it is ORDERED that:
1.
Petitioner’s Objections are overruled.
2.
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
3.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.
4.
There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
5.
The Clerk shall close this case.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
_______________________________
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 13\13-2240 sutton v. lamas\13cv2240.061814.order.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?