MOORE et al v. GRAND VIEW HOSPITAL et al
Filing
32
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT GRAND VIEW HOSPITAL'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 26 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS UNDER EMTALA ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE APPROPRIATE STATE COURT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE MATTER AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 11/24/14. 11/25/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RACHEL MOORE AND MICHAEL
MOORE, w/h,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Plaintiffs,
v.
GRAND VIEW HOSPITAL, ET AL.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-2384
ORDER
AND NOW, this _24_ day of November, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant Grand
View Hospital’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 26), Plaintiffs’ Response in
Opposition (Doc. 27), and Defendant’s Reply (Doc. 28), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND
DECREED that Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ claims under EMTALA are
dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is REMANDED to the
appropriate state court. The Clerk of Court shall mark this matter as CLOSED for statistical
purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
_____________________________
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, C.J.
15
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?