LARRY PITT & ASSOCIATES v. LUNDY LAW, LLP et al

Filing 66

ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS 1, 2, 3, 4, & 7, AND GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART AS TO COUNT 6. COUNTS 1, 2, 3, 4, & 7 ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, ETC. DEFTS SHALL FILE THEIR ANSWERS TO COUNTS 5, 6, & 8 WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 9/30/14. 10/1/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ LARRY PITT & ASSOCIATES, : Plaintiff, : v. : : LUNDY LAW, LLP, et al. : Defendants. : ____________________________________: CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2398 ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of September 2014, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 45], and the response, reply, and sur-reply thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as to Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7, and GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as to Count 6. Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 are DISMISSED with prejudice, as Plaintiff has already twice amended these claims in response to motions to dismiss and a Memorandum Opinion of the Court, and further amendment would be inequitable and futile. Defendants shall file their answers to Counts 5, 6, and 8 within 21 days of the date of this Order. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe ____________________________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?