MUKUNDAN et al v. RAHMAN et al

Filing 13

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTIONS TO DISMISS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S SHALL FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/20/13. 8/21/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DR. GEETHA MUKUNDAN, et al., Plaintiffs v. MS. SHELLY RAHMAN, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2446 ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2013, upon consideration of the defendants’ unopposed1 motions to dismiss (Documents #4 and #10), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions are DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint consistent with my Memorandum within twenty days of the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in sanctions, including dismissal of the action, as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J. 11 The plaintiffs failed to respond to the motions to dismiss in the time provided for in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. After the time expired, I ordered the plaintiffs to respond within fifteen days of the date of the Order. The plaintiffs have yet to comply with my Order.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?